AMD RX 6650 XT vs AMD RX 6600 XT
In conclusion, the RX 6650 XT is better suited for users who seek ultimate performance, while the RX 6600 XT is a better choice for those on a budget or who are concerned about power consumption.
AMD RX 6650 XT
Pros:
More powerful: Offers higher frame rates and smoother gameplay in demanding games.
Larger memory bandwidth: Improves performance in memory-intensive tasks.
Higher clock speeds: Provides faster processing power for demanding workloads.
Cons:
More expensive: Costs slightly more than the RX 6600 XT.
Higher power consumption: Requires a more powerful power supply.
AMD RX 6600 XT
Pros:
More affordable: Costs less than the RX 6650 XT.
Lower power consumption: Requires less power, making it more energy efficient.
Still offers good performance: Provides excellent performance for most games at 1080p resolution.
Cons:
Less powerful: May struggle in demanding games at higher resolutions.
Smaller memory bandwidth: May limit performance in memory-intensive tasks.
Graphics core
Release Date | January 10, 2022 | August 11, 2021 |
Generation | RDNA 2 | RDNA 2 |
Applicable Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Processor Number | Navi 23 XT | Navi 23 XL |
Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
Memory
Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Memory Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
Memory Clock Speed | 17.5 Gbps | 16 Gbps |
Effective Memory Bandwidth | 280 GB/s | 256 GB/s |
Clock speed
Base Clock Speed | 2359 MHz | 2359 MHz |
Boost Clock Speed | 2689 MHz | 2589 MHz |
Render Config
Stream Processors | 2048 | 2048 |
Texture Units | 128 | 128 |
Render Output Units | 64 | 64 |
Theoretical Performance
FP32 Performance | 10.3 TFLOPS | 9.2 TFLOPS |
FP16 Performance | 20.6 TFLOPS | 18.4 TFLOPS |
Graphics Processor
Transistor Count | 11.07 Billion | 11.07 Billion |
Die Size | 237 mm² | 237 mm² |
Process Technology | 7nm | 7nm |
Board Design
Card Length | 205 mm | 173 mm |
Slot Width | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Maximum Power Consumption | 180W | 160W |
Benchmark Comparison
Game | RX 6650 XT (FPS) | RX 6600 XT (FPS) |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 75 | 65 |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 85 | 75 |
Forza Horizon 5 | 110 | 95 |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 80 | 70 |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 95 | 85 |
Observations:
The RX 6650 XT consistently outperforms the RX 6600 XT by a noticeable margin, ranging from 10% to 15% depending on the game.
The performance difference is most evident in demanding and graphically intensive games like Cyberpunk 2077 and Red Dead Redemption 2.
The RX 6650 XT also benefits from its higher clock speeds and larger memory bandwidth, which contribute to its overall performance improvement.
Conclusion:
Based on these benchmarks, the AMD RX 6650 XT is a more powerful graphics card than the AMD RX 6600 XT. It offers higher frame rates, smoother gameplay, and better performance in demanding games. However, it also comes at a slightly higher price point.
Additional Notes:
These benchmarks are based on publicly available data and may vary depending on specific system configurations and settings.
It's important to consider other factors besides benchmark results, such as price, power consumption, and availability when making a purchase decision.