AMD RX 6950 XT vs Nvidia RTX 4070 Ti
TOPGPU|12 Feb 2024 6:37 am
VS
AMD RX 6950 XT
VS
Nvidia RTX 4070 Ti
The AMD RX 6950 XT and Nvidia RTX 4070 Ti are both high-end graphics cards, but there are some key differences between them. The RX 6950 XT is based on the RDNA 2 architecture, while the RTX 4070 Ti is based on the Ada Lovelace architecture. The RX 6950 XT has higher clock speeds, but the RTX 4070 Ti has lower power consumption and a more advanced architecture. Overall, the RX 6950 XT is better suited for users who prioritize performance, while the RTX 4070 Ti is better suited for users who prioritize power efficiency and value.
GPU advantages and disadvantages:
AMD RX 6950 XT
Pros:
More affordable: Priced lower than the RTX 4070 Ti.
Higher clock speeds: Higher core and boost clocks, leading to potentially better performance.
Cons:
Higher power consumption: Draws more power than the RTX 4070 Ti.
Runs hotter: Requires more cooling compared to the RTX 4070 Ti.
Nvidia RTX 4070 Ti
Pros:
Lower power consumption: Consumes less power compared to the RX 6950 XT.
Cooler operation: Generates less heat than the RX 6950 XT.
More advanced architecture: Utilizes the newer Ada Lovelace architecture, offering potentially better performance.
Cons:
More expensive: Priced higher than the RX 6950 XT.
Higher TDP: Has a higher TDP compared to its predecessor, the RTX 4080.
Lower value proposition: Offers less value for the price compared to the RX 6950 XT.
GPU comparison:
AMD RX 6950 XT
Nvidia RTX 4070 Ti
Graphics core
| Release Date | May 10, 2022 | January 3, 2023 |
| Generation | RDNA 2 | Ada Lovelace |
| Applicable type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Processor Number | 1 | 1 |
| Bus Interface | PCI Express 4.0 x16 | PCI Express 4.0 x16 |
Memory
| Video Memory Capacity | 16GB | 12GB |
| Video Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Video Memory Bit Width | 256bit | 192bit |
| Video Memory Frequency | 18Gbps | 21Gbps |
Clock speed
| Core Frequency | 1925MHz | 2310MHz |
| Boost Frequency | 2375MHz | 2610MHz |
Render Config
| Number of Stream Processors | 5120 | 7680 |
| Number of Texture Units | 320 | 240 |
| Number of Rasterization Units | 80 | 80 |
Theoretical Performance
| Single-Precision Floating-Point Performance | 16.6TFLOPS | 40TFLOPS |
| Double-Precision Floating-Point Performance | 8.3TFLOPS | 20TFLOPS |
| Integer Performance | 33.2TFLOPS | 80TFLOPS |
Graphics Processor
| Process Technology | 7nm | 4nm |
| Number of Transistors | 54 billion | 45 billion |
| Die Size | 300mm2 | 295mm2 |
Board Design
| Heatsink Type | Triple-fan | Dual-fan |
| Power Interface | 2x8-pin | 1x16-pin |
| Auxiliary Power Interface | 1x6-pin | None |
| Graphics Card Length | 320mm | 305mm |
| Graphics Card Width | 120mm | 137mm |
| Graphics Card Height | 50mm | 61mm |
Benchmark Comparison
Popular comparisons:
1
AMD RX 6650 XT vs AMD RX 6600 XT
2
Nvidia RTX 4060 vs Nvidia GTX 1080
3
Nvidia GTX 1650 vs Nvidia GTX 1630
4
AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
5
AMD RX 7800 XT vs AMD RX 6800 XT
6
AMD RX 6600 XT vs Nvidia RTX 3060
7
Nvidia GTX 1070 Ti vs Nvidia GTX 1060 6GB
8
Intel Arc A770 vs Nvidia RTX 3070
9
Nvidia GTX 1660S Super vs AMD RX 6650 XT
10
Nvidia RTX 4070 vs Nvidia GTX 1080 Ti